Quote from: blakus87 on Nov 28, 2017, 09:09 PMAlright, thanksQuote from: supermee3 on Nov 28, 2017, 02:02 PMA team has to be three members?
Up to three. Three is max.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Quote from: blakus87 on Nov 28, 2017, 09:09 PMAlright, thanksQuote from: supermee3 on Nov 28, 2017, 02:02 PMA team has to be three members?
Up to three. Three is max.
Quote from: Towelie on Nov 06, 2016, 11:44 AMLet's not forge the fact that Donald Trump is a fucking insane person with a thug attitude and who acts like he's rich so he can do anything he want.If anything Hilary is more likely to start a war, since she has been so outspoken about implementing a no fly zone in Syria. This no fly zone in Syria would require USA to go to war with Syria and Russia, so out of the two candidates the risk of war is in my opinion much bigger with Hilary.
Please don't vote this fucking bufoon, it will end up destroying the world, not just the USA.
Why? Because:
- He clearly said NATO should be disbanded and that he intends to no longer support his allies unless they cover the costs (oh really mister trump? HOW ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE FUCKING HOST YOUR ANTI MISSIL SHIELD YOU MASSIVE ASSHOLE SHIT TURD?
- He intends to stop "guarding" Asia and end the treaty which states that Japan/Neighbouring countries are not allowed to build nukes and in return USA defends them against any threat from North Korea / etc.
- He's Putin's bitch.
If this fucking bufoon is elected World War 3 will probably come and this whole planet will be destroyed.
I'm not a huge fan of Hillary Clinton either, but come on people, face it, at least she's not a fucking insane baboon who uses way too much spray tan on his face (except on his eyes who end up looking like a gorilla's butthole)
#VoteHillary2016
Quote from: BattleAxium on May 22, 2016, 02:53 PMNot me Battle xDQuote from: Towelie on May 22, 2016, 06:26 AMQuote from: BattleAxium on May 22, 2016, 01:56 AMIt'd be interesting to look into something more creative when it comes to voting. E.g. Events, etc.Managers are constantly "pushing" votes for events. Aka promising players they'll host this or that fun event if we get <x> votes.Quote from: Towelie on May 22, 2016, 06:27 AMQuote from: BattleAxium on May 22, 2016, 01:56 AMHow to get more players? Instead of throwing money at advertising websites. Which I can highly vouch is a extreme waste of your money (ESPECIALLY when you aren't flying with donation funds) Instead, cut down on those costs, and focus the money towards new ideas, developers, individual advertising etc. Because I can guarantee unique mini-games, new servers and incentives to spread the word will bring a much more FRIENDLY playerbase then current.Normal advertising is a waste, but what we're doing now (paying to be sponsored on the first page of voting sites) seems to work and to be one of the things getting us new players and keeping us alive.
These quotes were from @supermee3 and not me.
Quote from: BattleAxium on May 21, 2016, 08:00 PMYeah I didn't know if that was the case or not, which is why I let that statement stay Thanks for telling me thoughQuote from: supermee3 on May 21, 2016, 06:57 PMI honestly think there is too much going on for SFT and most of it doesn't look like it is working. As I am writing this now there are 5 of the servers on front page that I can't see why we still have, if money is a problem (I am assuming that every server costs some amount of money, and if that's not true just ignore what I am saying). If removing them would help on the state of the server I say shut them down, even though I know it sounds harsh.
I feel like focus should be on the main servers that see activity (Survival/Pixelmon/Bteam), instead of SFT starting to work on new servers when (lets be real here) it most likely won't help enough.
Just picking out this part since it's inaccurate. Most of the servers run on the same box. So, it doesn't cost more money to run servers. The only thing being expended here is resources. We could have 20 more Minecraft servers and still be running smoothly though. It's really a matter of is it worth keeping the extra servers since the main servers (as you say) really aren't full and doing well. But, I agree that we should stick to the servers that have a decent amount of players and drop the rest.
Quote from: TeraStorm on Mar 16, 2016, 05:06 PMD GATESQuote from: supermee3 on Mar 16, 2016, 05:01 PMQuestion for @TeraStorm :Udyr, he triggers me.
Most annoying champion to play against and why?
Page created in 0.022 seconds with 13 queries.