Apr 27, 2024, 04:25 PM

News:

Please vote for us daily!

Your Thoughts on the Ban-Hammer

Started by Protoshy, Jun 07, 2016, 04:09 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Is it Better for Someone to be Banned, or for Them to Stay and be More Likely to Break the Rules?

It is better for them to be banned, with no chance for unban.
1 (6.7%)
It is better for them to be banned, with chance for unban.
9 (60%)
It is better for them to be temporarily banned. (1-7 days)
2 (13.3%)
I could care less what happens to them.
2 (13.3%)
It is better not to ban them, but they definitely should have permissions removed for a while.
0 (0%)
It is better not to ban them, but let them off with a warning.
1 (6.7%)
It is better to just let them do their own thing, they've already broken the rules once, why do it again?
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 10

Voting closed: Jun 22, 2016, 04:09 PM

Go Down Pages1

Protoshy

Jun 07, 2016, 04:09 PM
I would like to ask the SFT non-staff community to pitch in on this. I would like to see how you guys feel about it when the ban-hammer is used. To be honest I personally think it's better for the griefer to be banned, though I don't enjoy wielding the ban-hammer itself. And yes non-staff does mean NO STAFF VOTES! I did intentionally put in some extremes just to fill in empty space and give the other options something to compare to.

ochoaj

Jun 08, 2016, 04:19 PM #1
when you're left out :'(
"Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."
― Benjamin Franklin

Doctor_Thanos

Jun 09, 2016, 09:23 AM #2
Quote from: ochoaj on Jun 08, 2016, 04:19 PMwhen you're left out :'(
Hurts....  :'(
Go Up Pages1